Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app2(p, app2(s, x)) -> x
app2(fact, 0) -> app2(s, 0)
app2(fact, app2(s, x)) -> app2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), app2(fact, app2(p, app2(s, x))))
app2(app2(*, 0), y) -> 0
app2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), y) -> app2(app2(+, app2(app2(*, x), y)), y)
app2(app2(+, x), 0) -> x
app2(app2(+, x), app2(s, y)) -> app2(s, app2(app2(+, x), y))

Q is empty.


↳ QTRS
  ↳ Non-Overlap Check

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app2(p, app2(s, x)) -> x
app2(fact, 0) -> app2(s, 0)
app2(fact, app2(s, x)) -> app2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), app2(fact, app2(p, app2(s, x))))
app2(app2(*, 0), y) -> 0
app2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), y) -> app2(app2(+, app2(app2(*, x), y)), y)
app2(app2(+, x), 0) -> x
app2(app2(+, x), app2(s, y)) -> app2(s, app2(app2(+, x), y))

Q is empty.

The TRS is non-overlapping. Hence, we can switch to innermost.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ Non-Overlap Check
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app2(p, app2(s, x)) -> x
app2(fact, 0) -> app2(s, 0)
app2(fact, app2(s, x)) -> app2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), app2(fact, app2(p, app2(s, x))))
app2(app2(*, 0), y) -> 0
app2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), y) -> app2(app2(+, app2(app2(*, x), y)), y)
app2(app2(+, x), 0) -> x
app2(app2(+, x), app2(s, y)) -> app2(s, app2(app2(+, x), y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

app2(p, app2(s, x0))
app2(fact, 0)
app2(fact, app2(s, x0))
app2(app2(*, 0), x0)
app2(app2(*, app2(s, x0)), x1)
app2(app2(+, x0), 0)
app2(app2(+, x0), app2(s, x1))


Using Dependency Pairs [1,13] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), y) -> APP2(+, app2(app2(*, x), y))
APP2(app2(+, x), app2(s, y)) -> APP2(app2(+, x), y)
APP2(fact, app2(s, x)) -> APP2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), app2(fact, app2(p, app2(s, x))))
APP2(fact, app2(s, x)) -> APP2(*, app2(s, x))
APP2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), y) -> APP2(app2(*, x), y)
APP2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), y) -> APP2(app2(+, app2(app2(*, x), y)), y)
APP2(fact, 0) -> APP2(s, 0)
APP2(fact, app2(s, x)) -> APP2(fact, app2(p, app2(s, x)))
APP2(fact, app2(s, x)) -> APP2(p, app2(s, x))
APP2(app2(+, x), app2(s, y)) -> APP2(s, app2(app2(+, x), y))
APP2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), y) -> APP2(*, x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app2(p, app2(s, x)) -> x
app2(fact, 0) -> app2(s, 0)
app2(fact, app2(s, x)) -> app2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), app2(fact, app2(p, app2(s, x))))
app2(app2(*, 0), y) -> 0
app2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), y) -> app2(app2(+, app2(app2(*, x), y)), y)
app2(app2(+, x), 0) -> x
app2(app2(+, x), app2(s, y)) -> app2(s, app2(app2(+, x), y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

app2(p, app2(s, x0))
app2(fact, 0)
app2(fact, app2(s, x0))
app2(app2(*, 0), x0)
app2(app2(*, app2(s, x0)), x1)
app2(app2(+, x0), 0)
app2(app2(+, x0), app2(s, x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ Non-Overlap Check
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), y) -> APP2(+, app2(app2(*, x), y))
APP2(app2(+, x), app2(s, y)) -> APP2(app2(+, x), y)
APP2(fact, app2(s, x)) -> APP2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), app2(fact, app2(p, app2(s, x))))
APP2(fact, app2(s, x)) -> APP2(*, app2(s, x))
APP2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), y) -> APP2(app2(*, x), y)
APP2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), y) -> APP2(app2(+, app2(app2(*, x), y)), y)
APP2(fact, 0) -> APP2(s, 0)
APP2(fact, app2(s, x)) -> APP2(fact, app2(p, app2(s, x)))
APP2(fact, app2(s, x)) -> APP2(p, app2(s, x))
APP2(app2(+, x), app2(s, y)) -> APP2(s, app2(app2(+, x), y))
APP2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), y) -> APP2(*, x)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app2(p, app2(s, x)) -> x
app2(fact, 0) -> app2(s, 0)
app2(fact, app2(s, x)) -> app2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), app2(fact, app2(p, app2(s, x))))
app2(app2(*, 0), y) -> 0
app2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), y) -> app2(app2(+, app2(app2(*, x), y)), y)
app2(app2(+, x), 0) -> x
app2(app2(+, x), app2(s, y)) -> app2(s, app2(app2(+, x), y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

app2(p, app2(s, x0))
app2(fact, 0)
app2(fact, app2(s, x0))
app2(app2(*, 0), x0)
app2(app2(*, app2(s, x0)), x1)
app2(app2(+, x0), 0)
app2(app2(+, x0), app2(s, x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [13,14,18] contains 3 SCCs with 8 less nodes.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ Non-Overlap Check
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP2(app2(+, x), app2(s, y)) -> APP2(app2(+, x), y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app2(p, app2(s, x)) -> x
app2(fact, 0) -> app2(s, 0)
app2(fact, app2(s, x)) -> app2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), app2(fact, app2(p, app2(s, x))))
app2(app2(*, 0), y) -> 0
app2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), y) -> app2(app2(+, app2(app2(*, x), y)), y)
app2(app2(+, x), 0) -> x
app2(app2(+, x), app2(s, y)) -> app2(s, app2(app2(+, x), y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

app2(p, app2(s, x0))
app2(fact, 0)
app2(fact, app2(s, x0))
app2(app2(*, 0), x0)
app2(app2(*, app2(s, x0)), x1)
app2(app2(+, x0), 0)
app2(app2(+, x0), app2(s, x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].


The following pairs can be strictly oriented and are deleted.


APP2(app2(+, x), app2(s, y)) -> APP2(app2(+, x), y)
The remaining pairs can at least by weakly be oriented.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
APP2(x1, x2)  =  APP1(x2)
app2(x1, x2)  =  app1(x2)
+  =  +
s  =  s

Lexicographic Path Order [19].
Precedence:
s > app1 > APP1
s > +

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ Non-Overlap Check
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ PisEmptyProof
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app2(p, app2(s, x)) -> x
app2(fact, 0) -> app2(s, 0)
app2(fact, app2(s, x)) -> app2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), app2(fact, app2(p, app2(s, x))))
app2(app2(*, 0), y) -> 0
app2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), y) -> app2(app2(+, app2(app2(*, x), y)), y)
app2(app2(+, x), 0) -> x
app2(app2(+, x), app2(s, y)) -> app2(s, app2(app2(+, x), y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

app2(p, app2(s, x0))
app2(fact, 0)
app2(fact, app2(s, x0))
app2(app2(*, 0), x0)
app2(app2(*, app2(s, x0)), x1)
app2(app2(+, x0), 0)
app2(app2(+, x0), app2(s, x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ Non-Overlap Check
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), y) -> APP2(app2(*, x), y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app2(p, app2(s, x)) -> x
app2(fact, 0) -> app2(s, 0)
app2(fact, app2(s, x)) -> app2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), app2(fact, app2(p, app2(s, x))))
app2(app2(*, 0), y) -> 0
app2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), y) -> app2(app2(+, app2(app2(*, x), y)), y)
app2(app2(+, x), 0) -> x
app2(app2(+, x), app2(s, y)) -> app2(s, app2(app2(+, x), y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

app2(p, app2(s, x0))
app2(fact, 0)
app2(fact, app2(s, x0))
app2(app2(*, 0), x0)
app2(app2(*, app2(s, x0)), x1)
app2(app2(+, x0), 0)
app2(app2(+, x0), app2(s, x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].


The following pairs can be strictly oriented and are deleted.


APP2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), y) -> APP2(app2(*, x), y)
The remaining pairs can at least by weakly be oriented.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
APP2(x1, x2)  =  APP1(x1)
app2(x1, x2)  =  app2(x1, x2)
*  =  *
s  =  s

Lexicographic Path Order [19].
Precedence:
APP1 > app2
* > app2
s > app2

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ Non-Overlap Check
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ QDPOrderProof
                  ↳ QDP
                    ↳ PisEmptyProof
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app2(p, app2(s, x)) -> x
app2(fact, 0) -> app2(s, 0)
app2(fact, app2(s, x)) -> app2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), app2(fact, app2(p, app2(s, x))))
app2(app2(*, 0), y) -> 0
app2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), y) -> app2(app2(+, app2(app2(*, x), y)), y)
app2(app2(+, x), 0) -> x
app2(app2(+, x), app2(s, y)) -> app2(s, app2(app2(+, x), y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

app2(p, app2(s, x0))
app2(fact, 0)
app2(fact, app2(s, x0))
app2(app2(*, 0), x0)
app2(app2(*, app2(s, x0)), x1)
app2(app2(+, x0), 0)
app2(app2(+, x0), app2(s, x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ Non-Overlap Check
    ↳ QTRS
      ↳ DependencyPairsProof
        ↳ QDP
          ↳ DependencyGraphProof
            ↳ AND
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP
              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

APP2(fact, app2(s, x)) -> APP2(fact, app2(p, app2(s, x)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

app2(p, app2(s, x)) -> x
app2(fact, 0) -> app2(s, 0)
app2(fact, app2(s, x)) -> app2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), app2(fact, app2(p, app2(s, x))))
app2(app2(*, 0), y) -> 0
app2(app2(*, app2(s, x)), y) -> app2(app2(+, app2(app2(*, x), y)), y)
app2(app2(+, x), 0) -> x
app2(app2(+, x), app2(s, y)) -> app2(s, app2(app2(+, x), y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

app2(p, app2(s, x0))
app2(fact, 0)
app2(fact, app2(s, x0))
app2(app2(*, 0), x0)
app2(app2(*, app2(s, x0)), x1)
app2(app2(+, x0), 0)
app2(app2(+, x0), app2(s, x1))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.